|
Post by Dagoth Gibber on Mar 12, 2006 22:09:46 GMT
Stay, because teenage loves are fleeting things, which never last. And often they are one-way.
|
|
|
Post by Cheesel the Menace on Mar 14, 2006 13:26:37 GMT
I repeat!
Anyone: A car is in an accident, it is burning, and threatening to explode. In the car is a parent and another man. He has the cure for cancer in his head, not written down anywhere. You only have time to save one. Who do you save?
|
|
|
Post by beansprut on Mar 14, 2006 21:02:33 GMT
Stay, because teenage loves are fleeting things, which never last. And often they are one-way. Yeah, only the love i have is NOT, ii repeat NOT, fleeting (unfortunately as it causes get pain). Oh and cheesel, neither. remember 'all for one and and one is myself'. i would run as far away as possible before it explodes. then call the police from a safe distance (or once i had found a telephone box as i dont own a mobile).
|
|
|
Post by Cheesel the Menace on Mar 15, 2006 1:45:43 GMT
Riiiiiight.
|
|
|
Post by fudge on Mar 15, 2006 18:39:58 GMT
would you rather feel depressed for the rest of your life but do something worthwhile, or be happy but work in tescos every day for the rest of your life and achieve nothing?
|
|
|
Post by beansprut on Mar 15, 2006 19:03:52 GMT
be happy and work in tescos. i know what being depressed and doing great things is like. it is so lonely. there is noone but yourself on that plane. very rarely do you find someone similar. and when you do they are too wrapped up in themselves to give you a second glance. so now i am in between the two. the higher plane is just out of reach, but im not the same as the 'normality'. Would you rather have your dreams fullfilled, or your true greatest and deepest (so deep you may not realise that you need it) desire?
|
|
|
Post by fudge on Mar 16, 2006 15:54:29 GMT
dreams fulfilled. if my desire is so deep i dont know it then i wont miss anything!
would you rather eat a talking cow or a rocket-propelled squirrel??
|
|
|
Post by Cheesel the Menace on Mar 17, 2006 8:40:41 GMT
Talking cow. Squirrels' are too stringy.
If you could press a button, which would make you rich for life, but it would kill an old man in a distant country - with no family - and no one would know you were the cause of his death. Would you press the button?
|
|
|
Post by beansprut on Mar 17, 2006 19:16:18 GMT
yes. but only so i could get down to working on my songs and books without the worry of money.
Would you rather go hungry for a month (assuming you could last that long) and save someone you dont even know, or let them die and get tons of sweets and foods you like?
|
|
|
Post by Dagoth Gibber on Mar 19, 2006 19:46:21 GMT
Anyone: A car is in an accident, it is burning, and threatening to explode. In the car is a parent and another man. He has the cure for cancer in his head, not written down anywhere. You only have time to save one. Who do you save? Weighing up all the pros and cons, I would have to save the guy with the cancer cure. Its unfortunate fot the other two, and the parents children, but so many more people could be saved with the cure. If you could press a button, which would make you rich for life, but it would kill an old man in a distant country - with no family - and no one would know you were the cause of his death. Would you press the button? Absolutely not. How could you live with yourself knowing that you had killed someone, anyone, no matter who, for your own selfish gain? Would you rather go hungry for a month (assuming you could last that long) and save someone you dont even know, or let them die and get tons of sweets and foods you like? Go hungry. Same argument as before, only this one has the added risk of getting fat too.
|
|
|
Post by Straitjacket on Mar 19, 2006 21:58:28 GMT
This is uncharacteristically intelligent discussion! HUZZAH?!
|
|
|
Post by Cheesel the Menace on Mar 20, 2006 12:00:15 GMT
Anyone: A car is in an accident, it is burning, and threatening to explode. In the car is a parent and another man. He has the cure for cancer in his head, not written down anywhere. You only have time to save one. Who do you save? Weighing up all the pros and cons, I would have to save the guy with the cancer cure. Its unfortunate fot the other two, and the parents children, but so many more people could be saved with the cure. Oops, I did mean to say one of your parents. Would that affect your decision? 'Ere, Straitjacket - Fudge asked fer Philosophy questions - I'm just obliging!
|
|
|
Post by Straitjacket on Mar 20, 2006 18:28:23 GMT
And tis most interesting!
Do continue!
|
|
|
Post by fudge on Mar 21, 2006 20:46:36 GMT
heehee i request and i can served!!
(im talking fizzle-shizzle bobo, aka CRAP)
|
|
|
Post by Straitjacket on Mar 21, 2006 21:54:04 GMT
RESPECT!!!11
....
*punishes self*
|
|